Now, I will tell you the 10 benefits of the Detailed Sperm Germ Leading Cell Analysis that we have developed for you at the point of diagnosis and diagnosis before our treatment methods and especially before a micro TESE operation;
1-This test tells your microTESE success chances very easily. Namely, the chance is high in micro TESE to be performed in a patient with all germ series. But if there is no germ series or the rate is very low, your chances are very low.
2-It shows your progress in treatment and your response. However, while doing this, it would be best to check the reproductive system both anteriorly with scrotal doppler and posteriorly with transrectal pelvic USG of the prostate and other formations and make sure that there is no obstruction.
3-If it is still not possible to have mature sperm cells despite the treatment, it determines whether we are suitable for ELSI with elongated spermatid or ROSI with round spermatid.
4-This method best determines the distinction between the wrong treatments and the right treatments. Because random drug treatments will prove to be wrong by regressing the system.
5-The cost is lower than the more expensive sperm FISH test. If the system is close to the last series (stem cell circuit close to the sperm), it is healthier to look at the spermatid FISH test at the last stage.
6-Since it is only possible to catch small amounts of sperm output in more detailed scanning, it is obvious that it is the most rational method for freezing the sperm by pooling. In an undetailed spermiogram, the sperm of most patients are wasted in vain.
7-Although it is said that no sperm was found in the operation after some micro TESEs, the fact that sperm is found with this test after the operation proves how important and necessary it is in preoperative prediction.
8-The most important first step in capturing the maximal development of spermatid related to acrosomal structure and nucleus is possible with detailed sperm prediction analysis and helps to select the appropriate case.
9-It is the most practical way as a role-determining follow-up procedure in the selection of medication and supportive treatment suitable for the period in the drug selection of your patient to be treated more recently. For example, let figs be the product you want to give natural supportive treatment. You will harm a patient whose stem cell system is the most backward. Or it would be the same to give carob to a patient whose stem cell system is behind. Because you know that things that consume testosterone will not be preferred in this period, it will ensure that you do not give it. The same information is true for hormonotherapy in the form of this logic.
10-It ensures that the stem cell is in the best quality phase in terms of both mitotic, i.e. proliferation in number, and maturity, i.e. maturity, and that it is in the best quality phase in terms of proportions, percentage slice and table, and ensures that the best circuit is captured genetically and the best cell is determined.
